A new report is stirring controversy with explosive claims about how staff members are reportedly instructed to address Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The article, which delves into the couple’s lives five years after stepping down from their royal duties, brings to light troubling details about their expectations in the workplace, particularly in regard to the formality with which they prefer to be addressed.
One of the more shocking revelations by Vanity Fair is the allegation that the Sussexes preferred to be addressed as “sir” or “ma’am” by their staff, despite no longer holding official royal titles.
While this request was reportedly dropped after one staff member objected, the article suggests that some staffers were initially encouraged to use these formal titles, highlighting the couple’s desire for distinction even outside their royal roles.
A source familiar with Meghan‘s Spotify podcast Archetypes and Harry‘s book tour explained that the couple’s preference for formal titles likely stems from their desire to maintain a sense of prestige.
“I think ultimately it’s cachet and sets them apart as different and special,” the source explained. “In the US, success, money, fame, all of that stuff exists out here. But a blood title, it’s few and far between.”
Similar claims from other staff members
The report also touches on prior incidents where staff members were instructed to address Harry and Meghan in formal terms.
Last year, Scott Moore, the CEO of Invictus Games Vancouver Whistler 2025, revealed that he had been told to use “sir” and “ma’am” when addressing the couple ahead of their visit.
Moore had inquired about proper protocol, and was advised by staff to adhere to the traditional royal titles, even though Harry and Meghan had already stepped away from their royal duties.
“When I asked how I should be addressing them when they get here, I was told the simple sir and ma’am is fine,” Moore shared in an interview with the Vernon Morning Star.